Why does Dr. Groothuis use the “cumulative case” as his apologetic method for Christianity? - Discussion Forum - Artos Academy (BETA)

Christian Learning Center Forums Discussion Forum Why does Dr. Groothuis use the “cumulative case” as his apologetic method for Christianity?

Tagged: 

  • Austin

    Administrator
    11/09/2024 at 14:40

    1 Peter 3:15–16 encourages believers to embrace apologetics by providing clear guidance on how to defend their faith. Here are two key examples from the passage:

    1. Preparedness to give a reason for your hope (1 Peter 3:15):

    The verse urges believers to “always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.” This shows that apologetics is not just for a select few but for all believers. It emphasizes the importance of understanding and articulating the reasons for one’s faith, helping others see the rational and personal foundation behind the Christian hope.

    2. Responding with gentleness and respect (1 Peter 3:16):

    The passage also instructs that when defending the faith, believers should do so “with gentleness and respect, keeping a clear conscience.” This highlights the approach we should take in apologetics: not with arrogance or hostility, but with humility, kindness, and integrity, so that our defense of the faith reflects the character of Christ.

    In embracing apologetics, these principles help believers engage thoughtfully with others while maintaining a Christlike attitude in sharing the truth of the Gospel.

  • Austin

    Administrator
    07/07/2024 at 19:30

    It draws from all aspects of study and is the most comprehensive approach to bring unbelievers to Christ, much the same way a jury would be persuaded when provided with witnesses, character witnesses, and field experts.

  • Austin

    Administrator
    06/29/2024 at 06:14

    The “cumulative case”, in drawing from multiple sources, angles and disciplines, gives a more powerful argument. It is also the logical approach because different issues of the truth lend themselves better to different approaches. For example, in addressing the resurrection of Christ, we may examine the circumstantial evidences or the lack of it, like a lawyer does. In addressing the accuracy of transmission of the Bible, we may examine the archaeological evidence for the ancient manuscripts.

    #apologetics

  • Austin

    Administrator
    06/11/2024 at 17:31

    The cumulative approach embraces the role of science in explaining the origin of the world and nature of the world. It considers history, the human condition, and Jesus. This approach is not a simple leap of faith that Christians are often described as taking. It is a leap into truth based on reason, an inquiring mind, and a desire for a more fulfilling life.

  • Austin

    Administrator
    05/25/2024 at 23:23

    His method brings all the “witnesses” to court. It incorporates history, science, philosophy and human experience into the discussion.

Page 1 of 6