-
Do you think naturalism holds an adequate basis for ethical values? Explain.
-
No, the Naturalist can’t hold an adequate basis for ethical values when they believe in no absolutes.
-
I do not think naturalism holds an adequate basis for long term ethical values. When your values are not based on an unchanging standard, the best you can hope for is short-term compliance. If your ethical values are constantly changing, conflicts are inevitable.
-
No because there is no basis for what is right and what is wrong.
-
If there are no ethical absolutes there can be no ethical values. There is no solid foundation for right and wrong if it’s determined by social group consensus.
-
No. They tend to sway their values to fit the need of the argument at the time.