-
Do you think naturalism holds an adequate basis for ethical values? Explain.
-
I don’t think there is. If there is no firm or absolute “truth”, then there is no firm basis for ethical value. Every culture is just able to determine their own.
-
Naturalism holds that the moral consensus of the group can provide helpful guidelines for ethical decisions. However, it is easier to live in conformity within the guidelines of the cukture where you live.
-
No because they only rely on themselves and not a creator.
-
There is no basis for ethical basis because there is no absolute truth. They attempt to go for progress but without purpose for existence, how is there progress? It seems relative.
-
Naturalist don’t holds an adequate basis for ethical values because they don’t believe in the existence of the creator. The belief on that thing happens on random chance is not convincing.