-
Why does Dr. Groothuis use the “cumulative case” as his apologetic method for Christianity?
-
25 Replies
-
It draws from all aspects of study and is the most comprehensive approach to bring unbelievers to Christ, much the same way a jury would be persuaded when provided with witnesses, character witnesses, and field experts.
-
The “cumulative case”, in drawing from multiple sources, angles and disciplines, gives a more powerful argument. It is also the logical approach because different issues of the truth lend themselves better to different approaches. For example, in addressing the resurrection of Christ, we may examine the circumstantial evidences or the lack of it, like a lawyer does. In addressing the accuracy of transmission of the Bible, we may examine the archaeological evidence for the ancient manuscripts.
#apologetics
-
The cumulative approach embraces the role of science in explaining the origin of the world and nature of the world. It considers history, the human condition, and Jesus. This approach is not a simple leap of faith that Christians are often described as taking. It is a leap into truth based on reason, an inquiring mind, and a desire for a more fulfilling life.
-
His method brings all the “witnesses” to court. It incorporates history, science, philosophy and human experience into the discussion.
-
A “cumulative case” would show that it is internally consistent, factually accurate and existentially viable and meaningful.
