-
Why is Revelation’s first-century historical context important to understanding the book? How has your understanding of Revelation changed after learning more about its historical context?
-
Revelation is, first and foremost a letter from an author to a group of people. This means there was a shared culture that is not our own. If we attempt to force our culture on the letter, we risk going beyond the scripture. I’ve studied this book many times in the past. What was presented in this lecture is material that I am already familiar with so I can’t really add more to the last question.
-
Historical context helps establish the language used and the allegories that were necessary during that particular political climate. This is much like Jesus explaining great spiritual truths in examples of everyday life in that particular era of history, i.e, shepherds, fishermen, Scribes and Pharisees, tax collectors, etc., etc.
-
It is important to understand the historical context so that we can not only disciple others but also make sure we are equipped to respond to the many ‘mis-interpretations’ of Revelation. Also, Revelation seems to be the ‘least taught/preached’ book of the Bible. I believe understanding the historical context will help me personally understand Revelation.
-
It’s important to understand the historical context of the first century because it clarifies the use of imagery. Revelation is a heavy book, and I’ve only ever heard of it taken literally. This has given me a new perspective that I did not think about before.
-
Revelation is a prophecy, an apocalypse and a letter. After learning about Revelation historical content, this newfound knowledge and understanding has helped me to view and understand the book of Revelation more so now when I read it.